And it's about time Paul. For too long we have been thirsty for an authentic tradition, one based upon Magisterial teaching as opposed to the false idea of "tradition" over at the SBC in Richmond.
Paul, I know you've told your readers probably dozens of times that Vatican II never called for the Latin language to be abolished in the Sacred Liturgy. Sacrosanctum Concilium, Nos 38 and 54 teach specifically that while the use of the vernacular may be extended, the use of Latin is to be preserved. Hopefully we are returning to sanity and obedience to the letter of Vatican II and moving away from the silly "spirit of Vatican II" - a chimera promoted by liberal "Catholics" to twist the meaning of the Conciliar documents the better to advance their own modernistic agenda.
Fantastic article Paul....thanks for posting it. Keep up the great work here at La Salette Journey.
ReplyDeleteAnd it's about time Paul. For too long we have been thirsty for an authentic tradition, one based upon Magisterial teaching as opposed to the false idea of "tradition" over at the SBC in Richmond.
ReplyDeletePaul, I know you've told your readers probably dozens of times that Vatican II never called for the Latin language to be abolished in the Sacred Liturgy. Sacrosanctum Concilium, Nos 38 and 54 teach specifically that while the use of the vernacular may be extended, the use of Latin is to be preserved. Hopefully we are returning to sanity and obedience to the letter of Vatican II and moving away from the silly "spirit of Vatican II" - a chimera promoted by liberal "Catholics" to twist the meaning of the Conciliar documents the better to advance their own modernistic agenda.
ReplyDelete