Now this is disturbing on every level. The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in its document Persona Humana - Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics, denounced the moral subjectivism which many theologians were defending based on a misguided pastoral approach, one which the "Rainbow Ministry" at St. Cecilia's appears to have embraced.
Persona Humana reminds Catholics that morals are not dependent upon human whims or changing cultures but rather on the natural law. The document teaches clearly and concisely that every sexual act outside of marriage is sinful thereby condemning pre-marital sex, cohabitation, masturbation and homosexuality (Persona Humana, 7, 9). The document condemns the flawed conclusion that a stable homosexual relationship may be analogous to marriage or justified:
"No pastoral method can be employed which would give moral justification to these acts on the grounds that they would be consonant with the condition of such people. For according to the objective moral order, homosexual relations are acts which lack an essential and indispensable finality." (Persona Humana, 8). See full text of Persona Humana here.
Is this teaching accepted by St. Cecilia's "Rainbow Ministry"? If so, as J. Sacerdo notes, why is it that there is "no mention of turning to Jesus Christ, no mention of abstinence and chastity as the route to holiness consistent ith God's plan"? Could it be that those who run the Rainbow Ministry at St. Cecilia's parish, the same people who want to give us a "Gay Pride" Mass, could care less about what the Church teaches?
John Kelly, the chair of the "Rainbow Ministry," told one Boston Globe Magazine reporter back in 1998 that "His faith has nothing to do with what the Vatican says, but only with what he experiences every Sunday at the Jesuit Urban Center." More than 30 years ago, Mr. Kelly "turned his back on his Church" according to the Globe article. Why? Because, during confession, he told his parish priest that is a homosexual and the priest responded, "May almighty God have mercy on your soul." Kelly says that he walked out of the confessional feeling "defeated and abused."
You see, because this good and faithful priest was not accepting of the homosexual "lifestyle," because he believed - as the Church teaches - that no pastoral method can justify homosexual acts, and because he had the audacity to pray that God would have mercy on John Kelly's soul, Mr. Kelly stormed out, turning his back on the Church founded by the Lord Jesus. (Full Boston Globe Magazine article here).
Later he would tell the Boston Globe reporter that he felt "abused" by the faithful priest who had the gall to challenge his sin. A Catholic priest who would have undersood these words from Archbishop Oscar Romero, the martyred Archbishop of San Salvador, given shortly before he was gunned down: "A preaching that does not point out sin is not the preaching of the gospel. A preaching that makes sinners feel good so that they become entrenched in their sinful state, betrays the gospel's call. A preaching that does not discomfit sinners but lulls them in their sin leaves Zebulun and Naphtali in the shadow of death. A preaching that awakens, a preaching that enlightens -- as when a light turned on awakens and of course annoys a sleeper -- that is the preaching of Christ, calling, "wake up! Be converted!" this is the church's authentic preaching. Naturally, such preaching must meet conflict, must spoil what is miscalled prestige, must disturb, must be persecuted. It cannot get along with the powers of darkness and sin."
Indeed. Which is why those of us Catholic bloggers who remain faithful to the Church's Magisterium and who oppose the false "gospel" of "Gay Pride" are accused of being "haters," and "bigots." Meanwhile, it would appear that St. Cecilia's "Rainbow Ministry," and the Archdiocese of Boston in general, is content with leaving sinners entrenched in their sinful state.
7 comments:
John Kelly's faith has NOTHING to do with what the Vatican teaches and he works for Fr. Unni who has the full confidence and support of the Boston Archdiocese? Dear Mother of God...where is Rome? These people must be removed immediately!
The Boston Globe Magazine article also says that Kelly is in a "long-term relationship with a man." In other words, an active homosexual relationship. And this is tolerated by the Archdiocese?
Dr. Joseph Nicolosi says the worst thing a young person can do is self-label as a homosexual. That, he says, seals the deal, so to speak, and a young person should resist the pressure or temptation to self-identify.
See more here:
http://narth.com/2011/05/teens-and-ssa-dr-joseph-nicolosi/
The rainbow ministry is not committed to chastity and holiness of life. On the contrary, people associated with this ministry have attempted to condone homosexual acts. Anne B, one of these commenters, re-interpreted Scripture to suggest that Jesus blessed a homosexual relationship between the centurion and his servant.
What is this but a teaching which "tickles ears"?
If Kelly is in a homosexual relationship with another man, are Archdiocesan officials so naive that they think he will be supportive of Church teaching?
What in the heck is going on here? Is Cardinal O'Malley trying to be deceptive?
All of this is happening under the watchful (or not so watchful) eye of Cardinal Sean O'Malley. He should be asked to resign at this point in my opinion. A man is placed as chair of a ministry to homosexual persons and not only does he thumb his nose at the Church's teaching authority but he engages in an open and declared homosexual relationship and the Cardinal is apparently just fine with that.
Shame.
The rainbow ministry is not faithful to magisterial teaching. Which is why blog posts were deleted. In all likelihood, the posts were encouraging homosexual and lesbian sex and that's why they were quickly removed during this whole controversy. I agree with Ellen - Shame!
Post a Comment