DARE WE JOIN THE DOTS?
"Pope calls Chilean abuse victims spreaders of calumny and says no evidence/proof has been given him.
Despite Cardinal O'Malley personally giving the Pope a letter offering evidence.
Now it seems the CDF made a recommendation that Bishop Barros should be removed.
The Pope personally removed from the CDF 3 priests concerned with investigating child abuse.
When Cdl Mueller asks the Pope for an explanation, he is told 'I am the Pope' and the audience ends.
Scicluna, the CDF abuse prosecutor, had already been 'promoted' to be Archbishop of Malta
Since the end of last year the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors has been allowed to fall into abeyance.
He has surrounded himself in the Council of 9 with those who have denied abuse like Cdl Maradiaga who described the abuse crisis as a 'Jewish media conspiracy' or more to the point Barros' defender and the Chilean Archbishop Emeritus of Santiago Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa, known locally as "the Sandbag" because of his failure to act on abuse.
He has also honoured notorious coverers up of abuse like Cardinals Daneels and Mahoney, who seem to have been prominent in his election.
During this Pontificate aberrant sexuality seems to be promoted.
The report produced on the 'Gay Mafia' seems to be ignored.
Accounts of his own handling of abuse in Buenos Aires seem [to] be mixed."
________________________
The sexual abuse crisis which exploded throughout the Catholic Church has its origin in a Culture of Dissent. For, as Father Vincent Miceli has reminded us, "falsity is the heart of immorality." Betrayal arises in man's heart and is soon manifested in his actions which often culminate in criminal violence. But, as Fr. Miceli lamented, "while we are all aware of the tremendous role of violence in the unfolding history of human events...what is not realized is that the apparent arbitrariness of and haphazardness of violence can be and ought to be seriously and precisely analyzed from the philosophical and theological point of view." (Essay entitled "The Taproot of Violence").
For far too long, many priests have been offering not the fine wheat of sound doctrine but the chaff of theological dissent from the teaching of the Church's Magisterium. As a result, we have experienced not renewal but a spiritual dry rot. Vatican II, in its' Decree on the Ministry and Life of Priests (Presbyterorum Ordinis) No. 4, had this to say: "The People of God are joined together primarily by the word of the living God. And rightfully they expect this from their priests. Since no one can be saved who does not first believe, priests, as co-workers with their bishops, have the primary duty of proclaiming the Gospel of God to all. In this way they fulfill the command of the Lord: 'Going therefore into the whole world preach the Gospel to every creature' (Mk 16:15), and they establish and build up the People of God. Through the saving word the spark of faith is lit in the hearts of unbelievers, and fed in the hearts of the faithful. This is the way that the congregation of faithful is started and grows, just as the Apostle describes: 'Faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ' (Rom 10:17).
To all men, therefore, priests are debtors that the truth of the Gospel which they have may be given to others. And so, whether by entering into profitable dialogue they bring people to the worship of God, whether by openly preaching they proclaim the mystery of Christ, or whether in the light of Christ they treat contemporary problems, they are relying not on their own wisdom for it is the word of Christ they teach, and it is to conversion and holiness that they exhort all men."
According to the Council, the task of priests is "not to teach their own wisdom but God's Word." And this task is of no less importance for the priest than his offering of the Eucharistic Sacrifice. Both of these are inseperably linked to each other: "The ministerial priesthood has the task not only of representing Christ - Head of the Church - before the assembly of the faithful, but also of acting in the name of the whole Church when presenting to God the prayer of the Church, and above all when offering the Eucharistic sacrifice." (Catechism of the Catholic Church, No. 1552).
For this reason, priests have the very serious obligation to teach the faithful under their care that it is never licit to have sexual relations outside of marriage; that a Catholic cannot (having been validly married in the Church) after divorce, marry another or otherwise pretend that sexual relations with another individual are somehow "marital"; that "formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense" and that '"the Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life" (CCC, 2272); and that "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible, is intrinsically evil.." (CCC, No. 2370, citing Humanae Vitae, No. 14).
The Church proposes these (and other teachings) as true and it does so in the name of Christ. The priest is not to question them. He is not to ignore them or neglect them out of a false sense of "compassion" or "charity." It was Pope Paul VI who said that, "To diminish in no way the saving teaching of Christ constitutes an eminent form of charity for souls." (Humanae Vitae, No. 29). Pope John Paul II reiterated these words in Familiaris Consortio, No. 33.
We are reminded in Lumen Gentium 14 of the Second Vatican Council that: "He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart." All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged."
When a priest ignores or neglects his duty, his task, of serving the Word of God with fidelity, he fails to persevere in that charity described by Popes Paul VI and John Paul II as a charity which diminishes in no way the saving teaching of Christ. And he will be the more severely judged (see Luke 12:48).
Pope Benedict XVI understood this. In fact, the Visitation Report into the Church in Ireland, which he ordered, stated clearly that, "It must be stressed that dissent from the fundamental teachings of the Church is not the authentic path towards renewal."
Pope Benedict XVI was, of course, absolutely correct in saying that such evil is still a mystery, what St. Paul referred to as the "mystery of iniquity." But at the same time it may be said with absolute certainty that falsity is the heart of immorality. That a culture of dissent - betrayal in man's heart - soon found its culmination in criminal violence.
2 comments:
This article makes a very salient point, one which points out the miserable failure of the bishops and priests, for the last 50 years or so, to teach Catholic doctrine at a depth level. Instruction often is reduced to arguing what you can and cannot do. Instead getting at the richness of truth inherent in Catholic doctrine, and to what God calls us-deep union with Himself here and now- we are instead at the mercy of priests who want to be popular and 'cool' and who want to play the game of splitting hairs regarding sin. I am reminded of my junior high years when the question was posed in religious instruction,'How long can a kiss be before it is a mortal sin?' Instead of teaching us the richness of the Sacrament of Matrimony and the proper place of sexuality within marriage, we debated such nonsense as this question posed. Father Micelli states an important reality when he says that falsehood is the heart of immortality. This understanding could be a lead in to studying Aquinas on truth--and people--including teenagers and even younger souls-- are well capable of understanding much more than many priests give them credit to understand. We are now living out the results of the shoddy, malnourished spirituality that was commonplace from the 60's onward. The dismissal of truth from the religious discussion has had tragic fruits. Hilary White, writing for the Remnant, has a new piece out about the damaging effects of Bergoglio's 'pontificate'. She makes some relevant points about truth that relate to what you hard written here. Thank you for this article.
Thank you for your kind note Barbara. We live in perilous times. And many perish for want of sound teaching. Hungry for the fine wheat of truth, the faithful are given chaff instead.
Post a Comment