Sunday, April 08, 2012

Bonnie Toomey and the Sentinel & Enterprise: Promoting satanic gender confusion

Harry Hay, the founder of the homosexual movement, began his manifesto for the Mattachine Society with these words: "We, the androgynes of the world.." Homosexual writer and activist Paul Varnell explains how Hay gave androgyny vital importance in the homosexual movement: "Hay's 'idealism' had three components: a) gays are qualitatively different from heterosexuals, mentally, psychologically, spiritually, not just in 'what they do in bed;' b) the core difference lies in the natural androgyny of homosexuals, that they embody both male and female elements; and c) in order to help promote their acceptance gays need to explain the contribution this difference makes to society." (Paul Varnell, "Harry Hay: One Big Idea).

Pope Benedict XVI, in a Christmas Address given in 2008, denounced the contemporary notion that gender is a malleable definition and said, "The Church speaks of the human being as man and woman, and asks that this order is respected." But our sin-sick culture, in its hatred for God and His Commandments, has another agenda. God's order is rejected. And this is most significant because, as Father Vincent Miceli, S.J., has noted, "It has been a special scar on the worst pagan cultures and the worst idolatrous religions that they openly attacked the gender identities of the sexes. They celebrated sexual indulgence, sexual experimentation, sexual symbols, fertility rites, temple prostitution, seasonal sex orgies, sexual abuse and enslavement of young women, girls and boys....But sex is not an accidental characteristic of man and woman. A human person without sex is a monstrous abstraction. Sex entails the very identity of each person; sex plunges to the deepest mystery of each person. Hence the sexes and the vocations pertaining thereto are not interchangeable. Each person is called to serve God and his fellowman, accepting gladly the sex with which one is endowed and the vocation attached to that sex." (The Antichrist, P. 231).

The forces of darkness continue to assault God's order by promoting gender confusion.  Exactly one year ago today, on Easter Sunday 2011 - which is, in itself, a sign of the spiritual battle we find ourselves in - the Fitchburg Sentinel & Enterprise published an article from Bonnie J. Toomey, a homosexual propagandist who writes a regular column for that newspaper, entitled "Why should pink have us seeing red?"  This article was a response to the controversy which erupted when the president of Abercrombie & Fitch, Jenna Lyons, painted her five year old son's toenails pink.

Ms. Toomey wrote, " is a beautiful color, and I think it looks great on a guy.  It doesn't mean anything.  But why do we get so uncomfortable when it comes to boys and pink?  Traditions, religions and a patriarchal society have put pink where they want it, not necessarily where it rightfully belongs.  My sons wore their sister's costumes and dresses many times..."  Ms. Toomey, ardent propagandist for satanic gender confusion that she is, goes on to insist that homosexuality is innate and natural.  I refuted her nonsense here.

Here we are on Easter Sunday, precisely one year to the day after this assault on God's order and His plan for the sexes, and the Sentinel & Enterprise is at it again.  This time, in a piece entitled "Give your daughter girl power," Bonnie Toomey insists that "Being wrapped in a pink and protected world did not appear to pave the road to success" for her daughter.  While Toomey believes that pink "looks great on a guy," and that "religions and a patriarchal society" have made us uncomfortable with boys wearing pink, a concern she finds unjustifiable, she nevertheless has a problem with toy stores which "push parents of girls into a plastic pink aisle bursting with Barbies, baby dolls, and princesses."

Toomey is a propagandist for demonic gender confusion.  Which is why she wants boys to wear pink but insists that parents who shop the "plastic pink aisle" with their daughters have joined the "indoctrinated ranks of bamboozled parents" who have allowed themselves to be "beaten into stereotyping submission."  Pink dresses and toenails are fine for boys but "a set of Legos or helping Daddy will help our daughters to shine more than any set of glittery Princess Press-on Nails Disney tries to peddle as art."

Toomey wants little boys to glitter like little girls and girls to play with Legos and [presumably] G.I. Joe - with the Kung-Fu Grip.  Although she heartily endorses pink for boys,  she sees pink as dangerous for little girls - something which will hold them back by instilling in them (gasp) femininity.  She writes, "I shared my girl power message with a young parent of a little girl.  I warned her of the pitfalls of pink.." (See here for full article).

Father Miceli warns that, "Women, in ever growing numbers, are despising and abandoning their femaleness.  They thus cripple themselves for the fulfillment of their sublime vocation of mothering children to maturity.  Men, frightened by the blazing fury of the women's liberation movement, are surrendering male roles and positions to psychologically desexualized women.."

St. Nilus prophesied that the day would come when gender confusion would be rampant.  And he warned that this would be one of the signs of the proximity of Antichrist.


Jonathan said...

While we're at it, why not fit our sons for bras and introduce them to the cosmetic aisle while signing up our daughters for Pop Warner football and ice-hockey?

Toomey is a confused angry Theophobe who hates God, His Commandments and the moral order established by Him.

ShrewsburyCatholic said...

I found this most powerful: "And, the impious one! – he will so complete science with vanity that it will go off the right path and lead people to lose faith in the existence of God in three hypostases.."

The Holy Father just warned us about moral darkness and technology. Go here:

Ellen Wironken said...

The implication is that femininity holds a girl back. Toomey writes, "My daughter was going places regardless of her gender [more "patriarchal oppression" nonsense]..." and insists that masculinizing little girls by steering them away from Barbie dolls and pink and having them play with Legos is the answer.

Toomey apparently suffers from self-loathing. I am an independent, healthy and successful career woman and I didn't have to forfeit my femininity to accomplish this.

As you have so eloquently said time and again Paul, making women "copy-cat men" is not the answer. A bogus masculinity fails to honor the uniqueness of women.

Toomey's column is an insult to women everywhere.

Janet said...

I'm a Christian (not Catholic) who finds the Sentinel increasingly hostile to Gospel Values.

The push to blur distinctions between the genders and the vocations attached to gender is on all across our culture.

I found this at the EWTN website.

Wendy said...

Toomey doesn't have anything positive to offer. She has bought into the lies of radical feminism and the egalitarians who insist that women have no positive value of their own and have to ape everything men do.

She does not believe that women have their own genius and so she degrades women.

Robert said...

I noticed a blog attacking you while defending Toomey. The blog is written by someone hiding behind the nick "Brenzoon." It turns out (big surprise) that this person promotes homosexuality and transgendreism on You Tube:

Samantha said...

The association between pink and homosexuals or effeminate men preceeded Nazi Germany. This is the reason the Nazis chose the color to represent homosexuals.

Pink has been associated with females for a very long time. Pink is watered down red, and is associated with girls because women have less of the qualities associated with red then men do: violence, passion, rage, power. By attributing the color pink to homosexual or effeminate men, we are saying they are like women.

The homosexual "community" (aren't they generous to themselves?) have embraced the color pink - think of the pink triangle and the homosexual group Code Pink.

Which is why it is all the more disturbing that Bonnie Toomey wants boys to wear pink and girls not to. She is INDEED working to promote gender confusion.

Zoe Brain said...

God's handiwork?

Paul Anthony Melanson said...

Yes Zoe, in Colossians 1: 15, 16 we read: "The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him."

Jesus loves you. He created you to have a relationship with Him. He shed His Precious Blood for you!

God love you Zoe!

Jonathan said...

Yes Zoe. We read at a science website which examines the extremely rare phenomena that:

"In Salinas, an isolated village of the southwestern Dominican Republic, 2% of the live births in the 1970′s were guevedoces. These children WHO APPEARED to be girls at birth, developed a penis, testicles and all of the typical male physical characteristics at the time of puberty. Most guevedoces were found to be descendants of a single common ancestor, Altagracia Carrusco. Their underlying pathology was shown to be deficiency of an enzyme known as 5- alpha reductase (5AR). This enzyme is responsible for converting the male hormone testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the more potent, active form of testosterone.

During uterine gestation, DHT is essential for the development of normal male external genitals. In the absence of DHT in utero, the external genitals develop as female. However, internally the gonadal tissue is that of the male. The guevedoces have feminized external genitals, a short “vagina,” undescended testicles and an absent uterus. With the testosterone surge at puberty, the tiny penis– that was thought to be a clitoris–develops into a normal-size, functional penis."

These children were really boys who appeared to be girls because
of the underlying pathology; in this case, a deficiency of an enzyme known as 5- alpha reductase (5AR).

So what's your point?

Site Meter