Sister Rupp, the self proclaimed spiritual midwife, claims to have learnt a lot from Eagle Crux a native American spiritualist and feels that she resonates with mystical islamic sufism. She tells us that everything is made of stardust including ourselves and that stones have as much right to be here as we have, in fact more so because they have been here longer. Her books include how to draw sacred mandela dancing circles and even have the rites for the blessing of the sexual organs! On Ireland she says that the Irish love of learning was first fostered by the wise druids and in the same article goes on to extoll New-Ageism as valuable and that some in the church are envious of it because it draws people toward spiritual growth.
In her book entitled "Cosmic Dance," this lost soul gleefully described a gathering of lesbians which she attended: "Different from me , thousands of them. Holding hands, kissing, arms around each other, stretching me beyond the safe world of heterosexuality. A gathering of lesbians challenging me to enter a world I never visit."
Is this why she is so welcome in the Worcester Diocese? Because she advocates New Age occultism and stretching "beyond the safe world of heterosexuality"?
Back in 2004, while accepting the "U.S. Catholic Award," the angry feminist lapsed into a hate-filled rant against the Church and her hierarchy while promoting the concept of Yin and Yang and complaining that women are abused wihtin the Catholic Church. Rupp asserted that, "Many women in the Roman Catholic Church are in immense pain because of how women are treated by this church, particularly by the hierarchy and other ordained clergy. I once told the late Bishop Kenneth Untener that I felt like I had 'just one little toe in the church.' He responded with a twinkle in his eye: 'Keep it there.' I have, but I also understand the throng of women who have left the church because of such things as the continued arrogant use of exclusive language and the constant refusal to recognize the fullness of their gifts in church ministry."
Rupp may have kept her little toe in the Church. But in her heart and mind, she has left the Church. She speaks often about "compassion," but her words and actions have betrayed the fact that she has not persevered in charity. And as Lumen Gentium of the Second Vatican Council reminded us, "He is not saved..who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a 'bodily' manner and not 'in his heart.' All of the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail, moreover, to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged." (Lumen Gentium, No. 14).
Can a person honestly be said to be "persevering in charity" within the Church if they attack the Lord Jesus by attacking His Pastors? Of course not. And we shouldn't lie by suggesting otherwise.
During her hate speech against the Church founded by Christ, Rupp insisted that, "Women suffer a lot because of the church" and asserted that, "..it's not just the ordination issue that drives women away...Women are not cows to be herded back into pens; they are not hens to be shooed away from the altar. It's this attitude of sneering domination and the obvious lack of respect for their individual worth that causes such immense angst in Catholic women today. I am very disappointed with the recent church document on women. I am saddened because it blames feminists for 'the lethal effects in the structure of the family.' Once again women are being blamed for society's failures. I am offended by the way this document pushes the power issue off onto women when the official church has, time and again, used power abusively to silence those longing for dialogue and has threatened into conformity those who dare to question doctrinal ultimatums.
Obviously someone forgot to inform Rupp that, "..the task of authentically interpreting the Word of God, whether written or handed on, has been entrusted exclusively to the living teaching office of the Church." (Dei Verbum, No. 10 of the Second Vatican Council).
Rupp, flying into an uncontrolled temper tantrum because women cannot be ordained to the priesthood, complained that, "Power rightly exercised can be healthy and helpful. Rome agrees, but only so long as this power is in the hands of men. When women begin to assert their rights* and seek to have their God-given potential and gifts fully acknowledged and accepted for service in the church, they are not only denied this right but are written off as adversaries, reactionaries, and power-seekers."
So much for persevering in charity. By venting such hatred against the Church, Rupp has shown her contempt for Christ. For the Pastors of the Church rule in His name and by His authority. If you want to read more of Rupp's hate speech against the Mystical Body of Christ, it may be found here.
Bishop Robert McManus asked Anna Maria College - and rightfully so - to disinvite Victoria Kennedy, an atheistic humanist, from speaking at its Commencement this year. One has to wonder why one dissident isn't welcome while another is. Is it simply because one is a Catholic religious? Dissent is dissent Your Excellency, whether one wears a religious habit (or in Rupp's case, I'm sure, a small pin to denote that she's a "Catholic" religious) or a business suit.
Bishop McManus, do you really think Joyce Rupp is the best person to be giving a presentation on compassion to the faithful of this diocese? Does her dissent trouble you at all? Her New Age spirituality?
* Ordination to the priesthood is not a "right," even for men. No one can take by force what God is not calling him to. Hence the need for a discernment period for men considering the priesthood and the Church's ratification of the vocation.
6 comments:
The only thing more ridiculous than Rupp is a diocese which gives her a platform to abuse others spiritually. Disgraceful. And how odd that there is so much silence in the local Catholic blogosphere about this - even from those who purport to defend Catholic teaching.
There is an explanation ShrewsburyCatholic. For most Catholics, it is important to be accepted by the status quo, een when the status quo promotes dissent from revealed teaching. It is moral cowardice. It is so easy to go along to get along. Far more difficult to stand against institutionalized dissent.
When I posted at another Blog that I too was concerned about Stacy Trasancos' dissent with regard to women's ordination, the Blog's author actually defended Trasancos. And this even though the Church's teaching could not be more clear.
Instead of agreeing that Church teaching in this area cannot change, that it is definitive, the author made excuses for Trasancos.
Many more will apostasize because they have not received a love for truth.
what coven of witches is "Sister" Joyce Rupp from?
The "Servants of Mary" - Servite Sisters:
http://www.servitesisters.org/
The problem is, no authentic servant of Mary promotes New Age occultism or lesbianism or women's ordination or inclusive language etc.
Servants of Mary? I think not. Daughters of Dissent? - absolutely!!!
Withhold your tithes and boycott the "Partners in Charity" fund until the diocese drops this sort of nonsense. And of course, boycott the "Catholic" Free Press.
The Free Press is about as "Catholic" at times as the National Catholic Reporter.
Russell should be replaced by an orthodox priest or lay person who knows what they are doing and doesn't possess a rabid and radical feminist agenda.
Post a Comment