"Before the war breaks out again, food will be scarce and expensive. There
will be little work for the workers, and fathers will hear their children
crying for food. There will be earthquakes and signs in the sun. Toward the
end, darkness will cover the earth.
When everyone believes that peace is
assured, when everyone least expects it, the great happening will begin.
Revolution will break out in Italy almost at the same time as in France. For
some time the Church will be without a Pope." - The Ecstatic of Tours, 19th
century.
Our Lady told Fr. Stephano Gobbi on November 15, 1990, at
Malvern Pennsylvania: "I announce to you that the hour of the great trial is on
the point of arriving. The
great trial has arrived for your country. How many times, as a concerned and
sorrowing mother, have I endeavored to urge my children to follow the path of
conversion and of return to the Lord. I have not been listened
to. You have continued to walk
along the way of rejection of God, and of His law of love. Sins of impurity have
become ever more widespread, and immorality has spread like a sea which has
submerged all things. Homosexuality, a sin of impurity which is against nature,
has been justified; recourse to the means of preventing life have become
commonplace, while abortions - these killings of innocent children, that cry for
vengeance before the face of God - have spread and are performed in every part
of your homeland.The moment of divine justice and of great mercy has now
arrived.
You will
know the hour of weakness and of poverty; the hour of suffering and defeat; the
purifying hour of the great chastisement. The great trial has
arrived for your Church. How great is your responsibility, O Pastors of the Holy
Church of God! You continue along the path of division from the Pope and of the
rejection of his Magisterium; indeed, in a hidden way, there is in preparation a
true schism which could soon become open and proclaimed...And then, there will
remain only a small faithful remnant, over which I will keep watch in the garden
of my Immaculate Heart.
The great trial has arrived for all humanity. The
chastisement, predicted by me at Fatima and contained in that part of the secret
which has not yet been revealed, is about to take place. The great moment of
divine justice and of mercy has come upon the world."
This prophecy is now being fulfilled (see here).
And no economic "bailout" will save the day. Only prayer and penance,
mortification and a sacramental life. But these are not considered "fashionable"
today. And so our sin-soaked society, which is morally, spiritually and
intellectually bankrupt, looks for secular answers to what is essentially a
spiritual problem.
Showing posts with label Utopia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utopia. Show all posts
Monday, June 30, 2014
Sunday, September 26, 2010
The Global Elite's Idea Of "Utopia"
In his book entitled "Europe Today and Tomorrow," then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, warned that, "Today we find ourselves in the midst of a second Enlightenment, which has not only left behind the motto Deus Sive Natura but has also unmasked as irrational the Marxist ideology of hope. In its place it has proposed a rational goal for the future, which is entitled the New World Order and is now supposed to become in its turn the essential ethical norm. It still shares with Marxism the evolutionary idea of a universe brought forth by an irrational event and formed by its intrinsic rules, which however - unlike the provisions of the ancient idea of nature - cannot contain within themselves any ethical direction.
The attempt to derive from the rules of the evolutionary game the rules for the game of human life as well, and hence a new set of ethics, is in reality rather widespread but not very convincing. There are more and more voices of philosophers such as Singer, Rorty, and Sloterdijk telling us that man now has the right and the duty to construct a new world order on a rational basis. The new world order, the necessity of which cannot be doubted, they say, ought to be a world order of rationality.
Thus far they are all in agreement. But what is rational? The criterion of rationality is drawn exclusively from experiences of technological production on scientific foundations. Such rationality exists in the sense of functionality, efficiency, increase in the quality of life. The exploitation of nature that is connected with it increasingly becomes a problem because of environmental hazards, which are becoming dramatic.
Meanwhile, the manipulation of man by man is proceeding apace with even greater impudence. The visions of Huxley [Aldous] are definitely becoming a reality; the human being must be no longer begotten irrationally but rather produced rationally. But man as a product is at the disposal of man. The imperfect specimens are discarded, so as to develop the perfect man by way of planning and production. Suffering must disappear, life must be nothing but pleasant...in this way new forms of oppression are born, and a new ruling class arises. Ultimately the destiny of other men is decided by those who have scientific power at their disposal and those who manage the finances...The human being cannot become a product. He cannot be a product; he can only be begotten. And for this reason protection for the special dignity of the communion between man and woman, on which the future of mankind is based, must be numbered among the ethical constants of every human society."
Having abandoned the God of love, the Supreme Creator, 21st-century man is now ready to worship himself and to usurp the divine powers of creation and destruction. In the words of Dr. Edmund Leach of King's College at Cambridge: 'The scientist can now play God in his role as wonder-worker, but can he - and should he - also play God as moral arbiter?...There can be no source for these moral judgments except the scientist himself. In traditional religion, morality was held to derive from God, but God was only credited with the authority to establish and enforce moral laws because He was also credited with supernatural powers of creation and destruction. Those powers have now been usurped by man, and he must take on the moral responsibility that goes with them' (Edmund Leach, "We Scientists Have the Right to Play God," The Saturday Evening Post, November 16, 1968, p. 16).
But make no mistake about it, when man becomes God society becomes, in the words of the French philosopher Gabriel Marcel, 'a termite colony.' We are still in the twilight. But unless we take a stand now, we will have the Moloch state. As at Auschwitz, men will determine who has quality of life and who should be "mercifully terminated."
The attempt to derive from the rules of the evolutionary game the rules for the game of human life as well, and hence a new set of ethics, is in reality rather widespread but not very convincing. There are more and more voices of philosophers such as Singer, Rorty, and Sloterdijk telling us that man now has the right and the duty to construct a new world order on a rational basis. The new world order, the necessity of which cannot be doubted, they say, ought to be a world order of rationality.
Thus far they are all in agreement. But what is rational? The criterion of rationality is drawn exclusively from experiences of technological production on scientific foundations. Such rationality exists in the sense of functionality, efficiency, increase in the quality of life. The exploitation of nature that is connected with it increasingly becomes a problem because of environmental hazards, which are becoming dramatic.
Meanwhile, the manipulation of man by man is proceeding apace with even greater impudence. The visions of Huxley [Aldous] are definitely becoming a reality; the human being must be no longer begotten irrationally but rather produced rationally. But man as a product is at the disposal of man. The imperfect specimens are discarded, so as to develop the perfect man by way of planning and production. Suffering must disappear, life must be nothing but pleasant...in this way new forms of oppression are born, and a new ruling class arises. Ultimately the destiny of other men is decided by those who have scientific power at their disposal and those who manage the finances...The human being cannot become a product. He cannot be a product; he can only be begotten. And for this reason protection for the special dignity of the communion between man and woman, on which the future of mankind is based, must be numbered among the ethical constants of every human society."
Having abandoned the God of love, the Supreme Creator, 21st-century man is now ready to worship himself and to usurp the divine powers of creation and destruction. In the words of Dr. Edmund Leach of King's College at Cambridge: 'The scientist can now play God in his role as wonder-worker, but can he - and should he - also play God as moral arbiter?...There can be no source for these moral judgments except the scientist himself. In traditional religion, morality was held to derive from God, but God was only credited with the authority to establish and enforce moral laws because He was also credited with supernatural powers of creation and destruction. Those powers have now been usurped by man, and he must take on the moral responsibility that goes with them' (Edmund Leach, "We Scientists Have the Right to Play God," The Saturday Evening Post, November 16, 1968, p. 16).
But make no mistake about it, when man becomes God society becomes, in the words of the French philosopher Gabriel Marcel, 'a termite colony.' We are still in the twilight. But unless we take a stand now, we will have the Moloch state. As at Auschwitz, men will determine who has quality of life and who should be "mercifully terminated."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


